Which of the following was NOT a reason for U.S. expansionism in the early 20th century?

The rationale behind selecting "Support for foreign democracies" as the option that was NOT a primary reason for U.S. expansionism in the early 20th century lies in the historical context of American foreign policy during that period. U.S. expansionism was largely driven by economic interests, national security concerns, and geopolitical dynamics rather than an altruistic desire to promote democracy abroad.

The desire for new markets was crucial as the U.S. sought to enhance its economic influence and access resources, particularly as industrialization necessitated new outlets for American goods. Additionally, the need for strategic military bases emerged as a necessity to protect emerging U.S. interests internationally, particularly in the Pacific, as highlighted by events such as the acquisition of Guam and the Philippines.

Furthermore, competition with European powers played a significant role, as the U.S. aimed to establish itself as a global player amid the colonial ambitions of established European nations. This drive for power and influence often eclipsed a genuine commitment to supporting democratic movements in other countries.

In contrast, while there were instances where American leaders espoused support for democracy, it was not a central or consistent theme in their expansionist policies during this era. The actions taken were typically more aligned with economic and strategic motivations rather than