How did the United States engage in "Gunboat Diplomacy" during its imperialistic pursuits?

The United States engaged in "Gunboat Diplomacy" primarily through the use of military force to achieve its foreign policy goals. This approach involved the deployment of naval power to assert American interests and pressure foreign nations into compliance with U.S. demands. The concept emphasizes the idea that the threat or actual use of military force could be employed to achieve diplomatic objectives, rather than solely relying on negotiation or persuasion.

For instance, during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the U.S. often sent naval fleets to places like Latin America and East Asia to safeguard American commercial interests or to support regime changes that favored U.S. investments. An example of this is the U.S. intervention in Venezuela in the early 1900s, where naval forces were used to compel the Venezuelan government to settle debts with American creditors, showcasing how military presence could influence diplomatic negotiations and outcomes.

In contrast, negotiating trade agreements, promoting democracy and self-determination, or providing humanitarian aid do not align with the aggressive tactics typically associated with gunboat diplomacy. Such strategies focus more on cooperative and peaceful methods rather than the coercive techniques implied in gunboat diplomacy, which is fundamentally about leveraging military might to dominate in international relations.